:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/45966860/usa-today-8440197.0.jpg)
For the sake of clarity, Vanderbilt shall be on the left, Stanford on the right.
| Category | Offense | Defense | D-I Avg | Offense | Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adj. Efficiency | 113.4 (20) | 99.8 (110) | 102.1 | 111.5 (29) | 98.8 (97) | VANDERBILT |
| Adj. Tempo | 63.8 (227) | 64.8 | 65.6 (132) | |||
| Four Factors | ||||||
| Effective FG% | 54.5 (19) | 46.4 (67) | 49.1 | 49.4 (156) | 48.9 (161) | VANDERBILT |
| Turnover % | 20.1 (245) | 18.2 (225) | 19.1 | 16.1 (26) | 17.4 (272) | STANFORD |
| Off. Reb. % | 32.1 (125) | 33.1 (268) | 31.1 | 33.7 (91) | 27.6 (38) | STANFORD |
| FTA / FGA (FTRate) | 42.6 (43) | 34.0 (117) | 37.0 | 40.0 (91) | 36.3 (164) | VANDERBILT |
| Miscellaneous Components | ||||||
| 3P% | 39.2 (16) | 33.9 (158) | 34.4 | 38.0 (40) | 37.7 (314) | VANDERBILT |
| 2P% | 52.0 (37) | 44.2 (53) | 47.8 | 45.9 (251) | 45.3 (82) | VANDERBILT |
| FT% | 71.0 (101) | 68.8 (144) | 69.2 | 72.4 (68) | 68.0 (102) | STANFORD |
| Block% | 9.5 (166) | 14.2 (17) | 9.6 | 8.0 (56) | 7.4 (270) | VANDERBILT |
| Steal% | 10.0 (250) | 7.7 (300) | 9.4 | 7.0 (7) | 8.2 (267) | STANFORD |
| Style Components | ||||||
| 3PA / FGA | 36.3 (117) | 33.0 (134) | 34.2 | 31.1 (253) | 32.0 (108) | |
| A / FGM | 64.8 (8) | 49.5 (70) | 53.1 | 48.6 (267) | 51.4 (128) | VANDERBILT |
| Defensive Fingerprint | Mostly Man | X | Mostly Man | |||
| Point Distribution (% of total points) | ||||||
| 3-Pointers | 30.7 (109) | 28.9 (164) | 28.5 | 27.7 (195) | 29.6 (135) | VANDERBILT |
| 2-Pointers | 47.5 (268) | 51.0 (170) | 50.8 | 50.3 (201) | 49.6 (215) | STANFORD |
| Free Throws | 21.7 (119) | 20.1 (198) | 20.7 | 22.7 (80) | 20.2 (196) | STANFORD |
| Strength of Schedule | ||||||
| Components | 103.4 (102) | 99.2 (29) | 102.1 | 106.1 (25) | 99.9 (58) | |
| Overall | .6187 (72) | .5000 | .6671 (39) | STANFORD | ||
| Non-conference | .3887 (293) | .5000 | .5260 (140) | STANFORD | ||
| Personnel | ||||||
| Bench Minutes | 31.9% (189) | 32.2% | 28.2% (265) | VANDERBILT | ||
| Experience | 0.71 yrs (347) | 1.67 | 1.95 yrs (91) | STANFORD | ||
| Effective Height | +3.6 (17) | 0.0 | +3.4 (22) | VANDERBILT | ||
| Average Height | 78.0" (23) | 76.7" | 78.1" (21) | STANFORD | ||
Ken Pomeroy's system sees Vanderbilt as the better team. The data predicts a 72-69 Cardinal victory with a 36% confidence that Vanderbilt will advance.
What stands out to you?