Stallings Comments on Cuonzo Martin Have Nothing to do with Bruce Pearl

Apparently Kevin Stallings comments on Cuonzo Martin have stirred up some feels across various factions of both the Tennessee and Vanderbilt fan bases. Analysis has ranged from stupid to ignorant.

Here’s an objective look at why he said what he said (hint: Bruce Pearl has little to do with it, unless you are a Bruce Pearl apologist with a local radio show).

His original comments:

I think for people to speculate on his job is absurd. He’s in his third year and that is ridiculous. He’s doing a good job with their team. I think they’re getting ready to make the NCAA Tournament. It takes some time when you go in there and you have to change some things and change the way things are done.

It used to be in this business guys got four or five years to show what they could do. The only thing that’s changed is people thinking that they ought to have more of a say in that, and then weak athletic administrations giving into that kind of pressure.

Hopefully, the powers that be over at Tennessee will tune those idiots out and give (Martin) the kind of time he deserves to do the job he needs to do.

If you would jump at the opportunity to cut off the academic arm of the University of Tennessee to give the athletic arm a major boost (let’s be honest, 95% of UT fans absolutely would) and you’ve been actively campaigning for the Vols to rehire the man that embarrassed the program by lying to his superiors and the NCAA, you probably are going to see this as nothing more than an attempt to prevent Bruce Pearl from returning as a threat. Ultimately, this argument is vintage Clay Travis (read: surface deep and supporting his narrative). He did touch on Stallings career conference record while at Vanderbilt (118–123), though in doing so he probably should have taken a deeper look:

Anyone with any in-depth knowledge of Vanderbilt sports knows Stallings comments are entirely about giving coaches time rather than about Bruce Pearl not going back to Tennessee. Let me explain.

When Stallings joined Vanderbilt, the program was in a horrible state. Gone were the packed gyms of the late 80’s and early 90’s. Vanderbilt had instituted a new ticket policy that continues to have a devastating effect on the gameday atmosphere (lifelong, vocal, and never-miss-a-game fans supplanted in the lower levels by wealthy, ambivalent, and entitled socialites with no personal investment in the team other than his or her money), and VBK hadn't exactly done a good job.

Transition and rebuilding

1999–2000 was a successful failure. Dan Langhi and company were famously screwed out of an NCAA berth, much to Dick Vitale’s chagrin on Selection Sunday. Langhi graduated that offseason and saw playing time in the NBA.

The next few years were several degrees more frustrating than anything about which Tennessee basketball fans can currently complain (would there even be unrest if the football team were any good? - LOL). A talent deficiency came to a head and Stallings began infusing young talent into the roster. 2000–2001 was Matt Freije’s freshman year and he played a lot more than most freshmen did at that time.

Despite a groundswell of fan unrest (there were some ugly individual incidents that I won't detail), David Williams and Vanderbilt’s administration backed Stallings and promised him time to turn things around. Of course, Stallings would do just that, and become the first Vanderbilt head coach to earn bids to three consecutive NCAA tournaments and the most of any Commodore head coach.

Since 2003–2004 (First full recruiting class as seniors)

Stallings has *direct, applicable experience* when discussing the subject:

It used to be in this business guys got four or five years to show what they could do. The only thing that’s changed is people thinking that they ought to have more of a say in that, and then weak athletic administrations giving into that kind of pressure.

This isn’t some veiled attempt to keep Bruce Pearl out of Tennessee (brittle, superficial argument is brittle). It is an honest reflection on his time at Vanderbilt and what he thinks is a fair shake for a coach, any coach. Stallings had no problem publicly letting people know he didn't like Bruce Pearl in the past; now is certainly no different. If he were actually capable of lining up an interview with Coach Stallings, Clay Travis could ask him straight up and he would admit it. He is well known for telling it like it is. The fact of the matter is Stallings would argue this point on Bruce Pearl's behalf. That's Stallings brand of no bullshit. He's a no bullshitter's no bullshitter, which is rather fantastic in a world of Bruce Pearl and James Franklin spin doctors.

Cuonzo Martin is 10–6, 11–7, and 8–7 in conference play so far as Tennessee’s head coach. He’s performed better in every season so far than Bruce Pearl’s last as Tennessee head coach. Bruce Pearl didn’t exactly leave the cupboard stocked at the end of his tenure, which is probably why his first instinct was to lie about some of the things he was doing to try to change that.

I do think it's time for Pearl to be back in college basketball. I hope he does end up in the SEC because he's a good villain. I just don't see how the University of Tennessee would go about pretending that it has any integrity at that point. Not that fans like Clay Travis give a shit.