Vanderbilt Outruns Elon Behind Smith's Offense, 45-14
James Franklin's debut as a NCAA head coach was a successful one as Vanderbilt topped FCS opponent Elon in their season opener 45-14.
Larry Smith showed that can he lead the 'Dores to victory, showing a new dimension of crisp passing to lead the 'Dores offensively. Vanderbilt's beleaguered offensive line did a solid job of protecting their fifth-year quarterback, allowing Smith to put together one of his most impressive showings in black and gold. Despite finishing 13 of 27 in the air, the captain showcased improved accuracy in finding guys like Jonathan Krause, Jordan Matthews, and Brandon Barden throughout the night.
Vanderbilt opened the scoring after a slow start when Smith connected with Fitz Lassing on a short cross that the backup tight end ran into the end zone. Elon, led by standout WR Aaron Mellette, answered with a 13 play drive to show that they wouldn't go away quietly. Dontay Taylor's one-yard rush knotted the game at 7-7.
Coach Franklin's risk-taking style would shine in Vandy's next possession, as the 'Dores went for it in a fourth and three situation at Elon's 16 yard line. Smith shredded the Phoenix defense on a designed draw to give the home team a lead they wouldn't relinquish. The next possession, Trey Wilson's pick-six pushed the Vanderbilt advantage to 14 points.
Elon would stick around behind Mellette's ability at wideout, but Vandy's talent proved to be too much. Carey Spear and Chris Boyd would add their first points as Commodores to push the team to a three possession lead.
Casey Hayward, despite being the victim of some of Mellette's big grabs, added a big interception in the fourth quarter to effectively seal the game for Vanderbilt. Wesley Tate would run an end-around from wideout to score from 24 yards out on the very next play. Tate's run gave the 'Dores a 38-14 lead and deflated Elon's hope of an upset in Nashville.
Jordan Rodgers entered the game at quarterback after Smith was shaken up in the fourth quarter with a minor shoulder injury. He made an immediate statement with a 30 yard touchdown strike to Boyd on the first pass of his NCAA career. While the rest of Rodgers's fourth quarter couldn't live up to the hype of his first pass, he still proved himself to be a capable signal caller for the 'Dores. He finished with 3-4 passing and 52 yards in just nine minutes of game time.
The win was a big statement in Franklin's first game at the helm, as Smith and his crew proved that the 'Dores can put together an effective and exciting offense. However, it came at the hands of an average FCS program who will likely go down as the team's weakest opponent of 2011. While the team showed that they can handle a SoCon team, they'll have plenty to prove when it comes to SEC opponents.
Still, it's a great start for the Commodores, who will look to push this momentum into next week's game with Connecticut.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Everything you could have asked for.
Quarterbacking looked good. Protection was there. Kicking game was solid. Excellent work on 4th down conversions and superior conditioning down the stretch. And most of all, a blowout win against a team that we SHOULD blow out and no sweating out the 4th quarter.
It’s only one win, but it’s one win. =)
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52
Cautiously optimistic
While I liked the outcome and the improved quarterbacking. I was hoping for more pressure from the defense. In fairness, the Elon QB wasn’t holding it long, but when he did, he had too much time. By the way, can we get #3 to transfer to VU. He was a stud.
by Smoke n Mirrors on Sep 3, 2011 11:42 PM EDT reply actions
Play calling
Was so much better than in past years. CJF said they would be aggressive and they were.
I wasn't too impressed
I did feel much better about the offense, but there were lots of concerns.
At the end of the game when we ran it up, Elon was totally and completely gassed. If we don’t have the big advantage in depth, this game would have been much closer, and most of the season we’ll have a big DISadvantage in depth.
I really did like the playcalling and I think the offense was generally better. Larry did a solid job most of the time. Zac looked good when we called runs (I’m hoping we passed more than we typically will because we had a chance to work on the passing game in a live situation). We’re clearly much better at WR.
The defense has me concerned. The secondary looked more like the last season secondary than the strength of the team they are supposed to be. The D-line didn’t really dominate, and I don’t recall seeing any LB other than Marve make a play.
I don’t know, I just remember my first Dore game in 2009 when we whipped Western Carolina, looking a lot more dominant than we did tonight, and I was excited and it didn’t mean squat. Now I think Elon is a lot better than Western Carolina was, but we really just didn’t look that much better than Elon until they wore out.
Not saying that I’m worried, but I do think that 45-14 is misleading. 45-14 is great when you spent the whole 4th quarter running out 2nd stringers, but it took well into the 4th quarter before our starters were actually able to put ’em away.
There were some good things, but we’re going to need more to get a win either of the next two weeks.
With the pick-6 and an Elon missed FG
Vandy probably trails this game solidly into the 3rd quarter. So yeah, that’s not great.
But, Smith’s accuracy and ability to pick shots was very encouraging. Granted, he wasn’t facing a FBS-level pass rush, but he still performed better than we’ve seen him. Rodgers was decent as well, although his decision-making in the face of pressure helped showcase why Smith is the starter right now – see JR’s -13 yard sack on his second dropback of the night.
Defensively, it’s discouraging how one Elon player was able to beat our 2nd best starter, burning Hayward on a few occasions. However, Marve looked good and the D-Line did their jobs.
It’s tough to glean much information from the win, but I think it’s encouraging – more so than anything we saw in 2010. At the very least, this team will be more fun to watch than last season’s edition, and that’s a huge improvement on a few levels.
by Christian D'Andrea on Sep 4, 2011 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought it went pretty well.
I took into account the fact that it was an opponent that Vandy is unfamiliar with, plus we don’t really know how good elon is. I also considered that it is sometimes hard to get up for an opponent that you are supposed to just steamroll over. Did Vandy make mistakes? Sure. Could they have done things better? Of course. But, when it is all said and done, I will take the end result every time. Not to mention that I saw remarkable improvement compared to last season on offense and even on defense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6ALySsPXt0
Do it...
Can someone please explain the optimism?
I didn’t see the game, but the numbers look ugly to me. Elon is a glorified high school team and they gained 300 yards against us, more than we gained against them. Their QB picked up 100 more yards than Larry, who just broke a 50 percent completion ratio (on the short pass offense we run with a QB who can’t throw).125 yards is pathetic, unless you’re only throwing 15 times a game to keep people honest against your unstoppable running attack. The defense appears to have sucked. 323 yards to a non-BCS school? That’s a disaster. From stats and highlights, it looks like Elon would have had a shot at winning the game if they hadn’t turned it over.
I’m not necessarily predicting disaster. Teams that turn out to be pretty good often look sloppy for the first game, particularly under new coaches and new systems. But I don’t see any reason whatever to predict success based upon this. That was a really, really lousy team we were playing. A decent BCS team would have outgained them 500 yards to 100 yards. Can someone tell me what I’m missing?
It wasn't great
But the stats don’t tell the story behind the offense, which looked much different than in ‘10. Particularly Smith’s passing accuracy and composure in the pocket. Granted, Elon’s pass rush isn’t anything near what he’ll be facing through the rest of the season, but that was encouraging.
The other encouraging thing was how Vandy’s defense got stronger as the game progressed, which was the opposite of what we saw in ’10. Again, not much to glean against a team with little offensive depth, but still a reason to be optimistic.
by Christian D'Andrea on Sep 4, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
You know why I'm encouraged?
4 penalties for 30 yards and 0 turnovers. If we can continue to not beat ourselves, that’s a world of improvement right there.
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52
by VandyImport on Sep 4, 2011 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Aaron Mellette
I can guarantee you that he’d be starting at any SEC school. He’s a stud, and he’ll be playing in the NFL.
He did a lot of damage after the catch. They were throwing A LOT of WR screens and doing a great job of executing the blocks to get the men room to run. Couple that with the fact that we were playing a cover 1 the entire first half and Mellette was able to do a lot of damage. Once DC Shoop made the adjustment at the half to commit to a cover 2, we limitted him to ~30 yards.
Anchor of Gold
Twitter: AOG/JAWiv
Facebook: AOG
Agree 100% with your analysis
I was pleased with the final score, but it did not reflect the game. Four three and outs before three fourth quarter touchdowns made the final score look much more impressive. I worry that the same defense that bent without breaking against Elon will break against better opponents. Yes, Mellette is talented, but you know who else is talented? Alshon Jeffrey, Justin Hunter, Marquis Maze, and everyone catching the ball at Arkansas. This game confirmed what everyone already knew – we’re screwed if anyone gets hurt on the offensive line. Not that the first string o-line is going to be dominating SEC pass rushes. Finally, I understand that Larry looked good measured against the incredibly low bar that he has set for himself, but I cannot help but think that Larry Smith ’11 looks a lot like Larry Smith ’10.
Still, I came away from this game feeling positive for one major reason – a loss against Elon could have been catastrophic to Franklin’s successful recruiting efforts. I also love that Franklin went for it on fourth down in critical situations. I don’t think it will mean much this season, but the only way Vanderbilt will eventually get over the hump against more talented SEC teams is by taking risks. Bobby Johnson’s system might have kept it close, but it also ensured that Vanderbilt was consistently on the wrong side of close games. I’ll take the occasional upset win even if it means a few more blowout losses.
Ultimately, I still think we’ll be a three-win team (Elon, Army, and an unlucky SEC opponent). But at least we’ll be more entertaining…
Sort of torn both ways
I liked the way the defense responded after Elon cut it to 24-14, only giving up 24 yards total on Elon’s next 5 possessions. Larry looked good when he stood in the pocket and delivered. And the return of +3 TO margins and lack of silly penalties (2 substitution penalties, Elon?) were welcome sights.
But there were plenty of things to work on. 309 yards of offense would have ranked 106th in the country last year. The offense didn’t need any help accomplishing (?) that. I will note that all four of the 2nd half scores started at midfield or closer — it’s a little harder to roll up yards when you’re starting at the opponents’ 35, so I can’t say too much.
More than ever, I’m convinced our OL line will decide this season. Larry can’t throw consistently on the run. He just can’t. There was one nice long ball, but he badly overthrew Krause on his first pass, and bounced one behind Barden’s ankles on his last. Both of those were designed rollouts with no pressure. He nearly got picked throwing to Lassing in double coverage, too. If he’s going to rollout, someone’s got to make him plant his feet before delivering.
(I’m also worried about his long-term health. That shot he took didn’t look hard on camera. Maybe he landed funny. He’s given a lot to the team, and I don’t want him having permanent shoulder problems when he’s 30.)
It was Labor Day weekend and an unexciting opponent, but man, those thousands upon thousands of empty seats in the end zone were disappointing. Everyone wants to talk about “changing the culture,” but it’s the wrong discussion. THERE IS NO VANDERBILT FOOTBALL CULTURE. The goal has to be to CREATE one, not change something that doesn’t exist.

by 





















