The NCAA's Worst Losses: Richmond
Can Vanderbilt avoid a third first-round upset in three years? Not according to Joey Brackets.
You can make a case that losing to 13-18 Georgia Tech is the Spiders' biggest mistake, but thanks to my background as a native of the Ocean State, we're going to go with a home loss to 19-13 Rhode Island. The Rams weren't even good enough to make their standard trip to the NIT this year, yet still tripped up Richmond in Virginia to post their first A-10 win of the season. Under the jump, we'll look at how Head Coach Jim Baron outmatched the Spiders despite having none of his sons on the team this year.
Richmond (27-7 (13-3 A-10), Unranked)
The Rams may look exactly like North Carolina (we even stole their mascot!), but they aren't exactly stalwarts on the court. The team hasn't made it to a NCAA Tournament since 2001, but has seen action in the NIT in five of the 10 years since, and have become a fringe candidate in bubble reports over the past few years under Baron's watch. This year, they posted their only Top 50 win of the season against Richmond, as Rhode Island heated up from the field to pull the upset.
Nikola Malesevic, an unheralded but steady player, torched UR from the wing, scoring 24 points (6-8 from 3pt) and pulling down 12 rebounds in the win. Both were career highs for the sophomore. Richmond pulled to within one point late in the game, but Rhode Island's composure in the stretch kept them at bay. The Rams burned down the clock and scored on a pair of big plays - a layup and three-pointer - that torched the Spiders' opportunity to claim the win.
Key to destruction: Composure in the final minute. Richmond was good over the final two minutes, but Rhode Island was great. The Spiders got the offensive rebounds that they needed to keep possessions alive and keep the game close, but the Rams allowed them no room to pull into the lead. Up by one with 1:40 left, URI started with a possession that used every second of the shot clock and ended with a layup that extended their lead. When they got the ball back with a two point lead and with 54 seconds on the clock, they burned 33 seconds of game time before hitting a dagger three that effectively ended the game.
This is an area where Vanderbilt has stumbled in the past, but it could be a major part of Thursday's game. Richmond showed a lot of heart and effort against Rhode Island, but the Rams won because of their ability to handle the pressure. If Vandy can do the same, they'll keep a potential Cinderella from dancing into the third round.
Keys to the Game:
- Contain Justin Harper's rebounding. URI won despite Harper's 25-point performance, but it's the work they did keeping him off the glass that aided the Rams' victory. Richmond is 10-0 in games where the senior pulls down nine or more rebounds, but he's averaged just over five rebounds in the team's seven losses this year. Harper's ability to clean up misses (most of his work comes on the defensive end) limits opponents' second chances, but URI was able to neutralize the big man and secure 14 offensive boards of their own, contributing to the win. Richmond has been outrebounded in all seven of their losses this year.
- Hit your threes. Rhode Island put up a Vandy-esque 27 three point attempts in the win, hitting 12 of them (44.4%). In fact, the whole team was hot, shooting 48.2% in general for the game. Malesevic and Akeem Richmond were the most prolific shooters, hitting 10-19 attempts to fuel the Rams. John Jenkins and Jeffery Taylor can fill this role for the Commodores, only with better shooters and more athletic play on the wings.
- Defend the perimeter. Richmond, despite having four heralded long-range shooters (Harper, Kevin Anderson, Darien Brothers, and Dan Geriot), went just 6-19 from behind the arc against URI. Vanderbilt has the perimeter defense to limit the Spiders in a similar fashion, but it will mean abandoning the zone defense for stretches to ensure that open looks are limited from 21 feet out. Fortunately, Richmond's guards aren't as athletic as many of the players that Brad Tinsley and John Jenkins have matched up with in the SEC, and man-to-man play should be effective.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
GT was a very athletic team, they just couldn't shoot (at all)
They really had no interior players, but still controlled the boards against Richmond. The reason they won though is because their guards got to the line a lot.
I'm calling the upset
Vanderbilt is the underdog right? Because that’s who I’m picking…
by The Goche on Mar 15, 2011 3:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You would certainly think that
I want us to win for a bunch of reasons…but coming in pretty high on the list is the fact that I live in Richmond and don’t want to put up with crap from fans of a team that has an arachnid for a mascot.
I spent my first year at VCU...
and hated UR for no apparent reason, even though my best friend went there.
I was also bitten by a spider or two the other day and they left big ass bites on my neck that are just going away now, so that gives me extra reason to drink some haterade.
I developed the power to pop the collar of my peacoat
To hide the welts on my neck…the power of douchebaggery, if you will.
I also don’t know if developing the power to summon dime sized insect bite-induced hives (2 to be exact) on my face counts as well.
um
having an arachnid for a mascot is probably the single most badass thing about Richmond.
and it has the most epic cafeteria ever
If you’ve ever been there, you know what I’m talking about…
I live in the OC.
The one in OH.
I mostly want to win so I can stop hear people telling me
How Vandy can do nothing but choke in the tourney.
All I ask for is that our team gives it their best for the ENTIRE 40 minutes, and not just 20.
Yes
I was much more independently annoyed losing to Murray St. last year than I would be losing to Richmond this year. Richmond is a good team (and honestly one of those teams that I tend to pick for upsets on my bracket every year).
But all the talk about choking in the tournament and perhaps more annoyingly hearing fans bitch about how this team has no heart or something every time we lose this season, makes me really really want this win even more than I already would.
Reading Joe Lunardi's Insider report on Richmond
He says this about “When Richmond Will Lose”
“An opponent makes a commitment to take away the 3-point shot and has a sound offensive game plan of its own. Nearly 34 percent of the Spiders’ scoring this season came from beyond the arc. Both Temple and Xavier made it a point to exploit Richmond down low on their own offensive possessions and then focused on pushing it farther and farther from the arc on defense. Both outings resulted in the Spiders’ worst two losses of the season.”
What do the Dores do? They defend the 3 point shot well. And they can exploit Richmond down low on offense with Fes and/or Taylor.
I have seen many, many analysts pick Richmond. The Vegas line is us by 2. But if you look at each team’s strengths and weaknesses, we really match up well against them. Their weaknesses are some of our strengths. They dont seem to have the style/players to attack our weaknesses.
What am I missing here? Why are so many analysts picking Richmond? Is it from our recent history? Am I blinded by my Commodore love? There are some significant non-sequetors here that I can’t seem to reconcile. Please help me out!
I'm pretty sure it's due to our recent weaknesses against Florida (even though they don't resemble UR)
and our recent performance in the tourney.
Pros picking Vandy
Hey, it’s one thing to be a media guy and be forced to find a 5/12 upset because it happens every year. It’s another thing to see where people put their $$. Vegas line opened at -1.5 and has moved to -3.
Vandy is the aggressor tomorrow and must continue to hit free throws. On the season, Richmond has TAKEN 612 free throws, Vandy has MADE 608.
by vanalyst on Mar 16, 2011 4:35 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
If we play our game, we should romp.
The problem has been playing our game with consistency. Then again, you look at our last 20 games going back to the opening of conference play, and of the 8 losses, 6 were to tournament teams (and 4 of those were to two teams seeded above us). Only the Arkansas and South Carolina games were to inferior opponents, and both of those were on days when we just weren’t playing to our ability (and when that one Hog kid went absolutely batshit loonball NBA JAM on us).
If there’s a knock on us it’s that we didn’t really have a signature road win this year. Missouri could have been it, Florida could have been it, but it just didn’t happen that way. We haven’t really been blown out of too many games this year either; we were in it down the stretch in almost every loss. Only problem is, you get the L regardless of how close it was.
If you look at this in December on the non-conf schedule, say at Maui or somewhere, you’re probably penciling it in as a W. I think it’s just our dreadful recent history once the February page tears off the calendar that makes people nervous. Like myself. I will be on the Guinness from approx. 8:06 AM tomorrow (you can drink on the Caltrain but not on the platform, WTF).
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52

by 




















