Cleveland State Dominates a Sloppy Vanderbilt Team in 71-58 Upset
The only consolation that Vanderbilt fans can take away from today's game with Cleveland State is that things couldn't have gotten much worse.
The Vikings rolled the #7 Commodores 71-58 in the second game of the 2011-2012 campaign. Vanderbilt simply looked lost in Memorial Gym, botching everything from turnovers to free throws in a contest they never led in. John Jenkins and Jeffery Taylor, Vandy's returning stars, combined for 26 sloppy points on 8-22 shooting.
Vanderbilt struggled to find their rhythm early as Cleveland State jumped out to an 11-4 lead four minutes into the game. Commodore turnovers and blown assignments gave the Vikings plenty of easy opportunities to push their lead, creating a deficit that grew to as many as 16 points in the first half. Kevin Stallings was able to rally his team at the half and cut CSU's lead to three points midway through the second frame, but Vanderbilt turnovers squashed any chance of a game-altering run.
Mistakes doomed Vandy throughout the contest. The 'Dores finished with 21 turnovers and shot just 36 percent from the field. Jenkins and Taylor combined for nine turnovers in a game where both players got caught up trying to force their offense on the court. The final 10 minutes of the game saw Cleveland State pulling away with easy baskets every time Vanderbilt threatened the CSU lead.
Steve Tchiengang did a solid job on the glass in Festus Ezeli's place, but couldn't replicate the senior center's presence in the post. Cleveland State scored effectively in the paint, shooting 50 percent from the field and taking advantage of Vandy's lax defense. Tchiengang finished with 10 rebounds - including six offensive boards - but scored just five points on 1-5 shooting. The team's bench, a strength in 2011-2012 thanks to the presence of some highly-touted freshmen, contributed only nine points.
The loss will drop Vanderbilt out of the top ten in the national rankings. They'll have a chance to regroup on Tuesday with a home game against Bucknell.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
CSU is probably a solid team
But there is absolutely NO excuse for that disaster of a performance. This team has a long way to go. If I were an AP voter, I would leave them off my ballot next week. UK and UF would smoke this team by 30+ if they played right now.
Bucknell will beat them too if they play like they did tonight
CKS has to find a way to make the offense less 1-dimensional without Festus. Clearly post play without Fes isn’t half as good as post play with Fes, but we can’t completely abandon any attempt of going down low.
Otherwise it’s just effort and focus.
The effort was awful all night for almost everyone.
And for focus, the turnovers aren’t even mostly caused by their defense, which was solid, but more by getting frustrated by the defense, and just dribbling into a dead-end or making a stupid pass. Didn’t just about every 3 we took in the second half look like we stopped, thought, “should I take this shot? … Yeah, I should…” miss. The missed free throws are yet another example.
CKS needs to whip them into shape. But I’m not overly concerned.
Watching this team play you’d think they didn’t have any players who had ever played in the paint before. Sure Steve and Lance aren’t traditional centers, but they should still be able to get some touches down there, especially when they are the same height or taller than their defenders. Oh yeah, and we have a 6’11" guy who play all of 2 minutes or something absurd like that. There’s really no excuse to have absolutely no post game, especially against a team as small as cleveland state.
Cleveland
“The Commodores were sloppy, missing easy layups, throwing the ball away repeatedly and even struggling at the free throw line despite a huge advantage there.”
Why did we schedule this game? Seems like nobody cared. Except Cleveland. This is exactly what I don’t like about this team. No pride.
can you win the ticketcity classic if you lose your opening game?
So many questions, most of them badm. Does the team respond like Furman ’06 or draw another scrappy mid-major for an early ncaa exit? Can cks handle national attention?
by vanalyst on Nov 13, 2011 5:02 PM EST via mobile reply actions
You can, and I really hate that
Cleveland State comes into Nashville, throttles a Top 10 team, and gets rewarded by still being stuck in a “subregional” bracket with Boston University, Hofstra, and Rhode Island. Ridiculous.
I mentioned this during the game
But I really think maybe Festus is the most important player on this team. I still think JJ is the best player (and I honestly think Fes is better than Jeff anyway), but if we lose JJ or Jeff, we don’t entirely lose the ability to play behind the perimeter.
At least until CKS figures out how to get something going down low, or until we get Fes back, we’re way too easy to stop offensively.
JJ and JT are good enough players that we’ll win some as a 1 dimensional team, but if they have bad games, we will lose.
I do agree with what someone said in the game thread or maybe Twitter that Cleveland state beat us the same way Pearl’s teams did, by being quick, physical and high pressure.
I think CKS is a good coach, and he’s brought us a long way, but I still don’t know what I think about his game planning. He just doesn’t seem to react well to bad matchups. The same things tend to beat his teams, and obviously any system will have its weaknesses, but you have to show at least some ability to cover those weaknesses.
I know people also say he maybe doesn’t motivate well, but I think rather than lack of motivation it seems more like lack of focus/toughness. (thought today it looked like both).
As already noted, I wonder about his timeouts and still don’t know why, if he’s so good out of the timeout, we can never get a good last shot.
Add a new wrinkle today, the inexplicable non-use of Henderson when he plays in our biggest position of need and did relatively well in the 5% of the game he played. Henderson has a long way to go, and will struggle probably pretty frequently, but all we needed was some solid minutes at the 5 and he’s done that in both games this year. How he only played 2 minutes (during which he had 4 boards, a steal, drew a foul and saved a ball out of bounds) baffles me.
Compare his 2 minutes to Kedren and Dai-Jon and what they accomplished today in their 10 and 7 minutes.
Oh no. Hell may be freezing over.
I agree with nearly all of what you wrote here and above.
I just don’t understand how you get from what you wrote to the conclusion that we’re still a formidable team without Ezeli. One dimensional teams don’t tend to beat quality opponents, particularly when there are major styles of play that CKS seems completely unable to counter.
by Andrew D. Smith on Nov 13, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions
2 reasons:
1. not every team plays this way. Teams can’t just decide to be physical and high pressure, so I don’t think too many teams will be able take advantage of that weakness.
2. I don’t think that we should be entirely incapable of using the post in the offense without Festus. And CKS does know a bit about scheming, so I think they’ll figure out how to do it (if Steve is healthy, which I’m not sure of).
And 3. (bonus reason) I never said we were really good without Festus. I honestly think we’re probably not a top 25 team without him. Like you said, 20-25, maybe worse. I think we could be 20-25, but we’ll probably be worse. I think we’re good, but far from great without him.
Like I said, if JJ and Jeff had bad games we’ll lose. But they are really good (even if Jeff is wildly inconsistent he’s rarely this actively terrible – sidenote: 6 EFFING TURNOVERS?) so we’ll be fine most days.
But I don’t think we were overrated because I do think that with Festus we are a top 10 team. No one ever said we were #7 in the nation without Fes. If you take away a lot of teams 1st or 2nd best player, they would look pretty bad.
I think in the end, we’ll be there. Like last season, UNC was #8, got beat a few times, everyone says OVERRATED, but they end up in the elite 8 when they get it figured out. Obvious difference, their excuse was they were young and we certainly don’t have that excuse, but us losing Fes isn’t exactly Duke losing Kyrie Irving.
My only real concern at this point is if Fes isn’t able to get full strength/speed. Since he was such a project to get as good as he got, you wonder if being out of practice will be a huge issue for him than with other guys. But I guess you can never know with the injuries.
But I don’t think we’re overrated because if Fes does come back at the same level as last season, we’ll be very very good.
FWIW ...
I think Festus is our best player. Period. And I’ve thought that ever since I started seeing him put way below Jenkins and even Taylor on a lot of national “lists” …
Jenkins is our best scorer, but he’s still not playing defense worth poo. Taylor is apparently still too inconsistent, and too dependent on everything being set up just right; I wish he would just come down the court and pop a three pointer every once in awhile, a la Byars/Beal. Just play basketball, dude, stop thinking so much.
But Festus … man, that guy just goes all in on both ends of the court every trip, has a remarkable offensive skill set based on his experience, and terrifies other teams with his presence on defense. Simply put, we need the guy back.
But, we have the talent to be a top 20 or even top 10 team without him, and we’re just not there right now … good news is that it’s still early. Our other guys have ten games to figure this thing out now, or else Deputy Festus is gonna lay down the law when he gets back, and it ain’t gonna be pretty.
I agree with most points
I am not sold on CKS being a long term solution for this team if they want to really become an elite program. How many times do we have to see games like this before we try to go in another direction? With King leaving, I’m worried about the next 5 years.
Henderson could have been a good post presence tonight. Just his big body being down there would have kept the d honest and allowed some of our shooters to get open. Even if he isn’t as dominating as Fes, he is still 6’11 and capable of scoring/rebounding. I have no idea why CKS would ignore his abilities.
I really don’t know what to say about JT anymore. He showed up in spurts and barely tried to get to the rim for most of the game. For someone so athletic, he doesn’t seem to make great use of his gifts.
JJ was cold tonight, but he also didn’t seem to really try to get open as fervently as he did last year. Hell, DJ seemed to try harder when he was in the game.
It was like they were trying to play a perimeter game tonight and then refused to shoot when given the opportunity. The 15 or so missed layups didn’t help things much.
I don’t know what it will take to light a fire under these guys but CKS needs to figure that out…
CKS
This may be old news but I have heard recently from a couple sources this may be his final year as he is going to retire.
Taylor needs a little CJF in his life
Do you think Franklin can come teach these kids to play with some urgency and swagger? At the game, the lack of passion and urgency from pretty much every player (with the exception of Lance and Dai’ Jon) was ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC. Obviously there were bits of hustle from everyone, but it didn’t feel consistent
I am going to call a spade a spade. Jeff Taylor is just as soft as he is athletic.
He had that same expression on his face- a look of confusion, frustration, timidness, and a general aversion to being an aggressive and great player. Could someone please do a better job describing that stupid expression that makes him look like a (insert: another word for a cat)?
Its as if Jeff and I were thinking the same thing during the game, “this can’t be happening.” The only problem is that he is the person who is supposed to do something about it… Lance tried. He was driving the ball with a consistent offensive authority. Jeff plays timid. I only saw one backdoor cut today and it was by Jenkins. At times, there were WIDE open lanes and Taylor didn’t charge them.
I think the reason that Taylor plays that way is because of CKS. Stallings would not be the guy to get me excited to play basketball. He subs people out as soon as they do something wrong, and doesn’t let them get in the flow. I noticed that a bunch in the Oregon game.
It is my hope that someone with a bigger knowledge base blows this post up, but I walked out of Memorial with only one thing running through my mind: I NEED TO COMPLETELY RESET MY EXPECTATIONS.
by CorneliusHimself on Nov 13, 2011 10:42 PM EST reply actions
Just read the game thread
Clearly I shared some similar views… and it didn’t make me feel better.
by CorneliusHimself on Nov 13, 2011 10:57 PM EST up reply actions
I said this jokingly, but it is kind of true. CJF needs to come teach the bball team to play 35 seconds at a time. Win this possession, give it everything, worry about the next possession when it gets here.
I will say one thing about expectations (if Fes is able to play full speed when he gets back) there is no need to completely blow up your expectations, because it was a very good team last season and they have everything back. We should have gone further and I don’t totally buy that we have some programatic inability to get beyond the 1st round.
We may just need to temper our expectations as to whether this team is going to be that much better than last season. All that senior leadership HAS to count for something you’d think, but it sure didn’t today.
not kind of true... its a fact
Someone mentioned that they don’t look like they are having any fun out there- and I think that comes from their personal expectations. It’s hard to have any expectations when you are playing one possession at a time. Its also hard to not have a good time when you are competing one possession at a time.
Sidenote: could we also get CJF to coach the cheerleaders for a week? I am deadly serious about this. The cheerleaders were the most uninspiring people in the gym. There needs to be a revolution in cheer leading where they actually teach Vanderbilt fans how to cheer. I think CJF should start this with the cheerleaders at the BBall games, and it will translate to Football.
(p.s. I am fully drinking the CJF coolaid and loving it)
by CorneliusHimself on Nov 14, 2011 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
This is a first...
As a Vandy fan this is the first time I’m more excited about the football season then the basketball. lol Thank god there is still a couple of games left and probably a bowl. “keeping my fingers crossed”.
agreed...
and god it makes me anxious
by CorneliusHimself on Nov 14, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
Disappointing
Watching this team nearly blow a 20-point lead against Oregon, I began to wonder whether the prognosticators were wrong. Watching this team get blown off its home court by Cleveland St. hammered the point home – this team, at least without Festus, is pretty much the same team it was last year and the year before.
This team still lacks a post game other than Festus – if outside shots are not falling, we’re fucked. Taylor still makes poor decisions and doesn’t take care of the ball. Jenkins still cannot create opportunities other than running around the three-point line calling for the ball and the occasional fast break. The young guards off the bench (Parker, Fuller, Johnson) still look like they are not ready for primetime and cannot make wide open shots. The defense still cannot contain speedy guards.
It’s early, but I worry we are looking at a repeat of the past two seasons. Another good, but not great, regular season – punctuated with a few great games and performances against top opponents – followed by postseason disappointment. The struggles to start 2006 give me some hope that this year’s early season struggles are meaningless, but not much. I can’t help but think that our supposed Final Four team will just go down as another one-and-done “soft” Vandy squad.
SOV?
Hate to say it...
But I agree with your evaluation here Dan. It was clear from the game that this year’s squad has the same fatal flaws as last year’s squad. What is so frustrating is that on paper this team has as the components to be a juggernaut – just like last year’s team. But something is missing.
Sometimes it seems like this team needs the sort of psychological readjustment that Football just received with CJF. I think of CJF running down the sidelines yelling, “This is not the Same Old Vanderbilt!” at the players when things turned sour in the UCONN game. I think it may be time for that sort of spark in basketball – not in order to have a good regular season, which this team will certainly achieve, but to really realize their potential.
This game just reminded me too much of our recent early exits against mid-majors. It left that kind of sick-to-the-stomach feeling, even though – thankfully – this game is in November.
by Pope Vanderbilt on Nov 14, 2011 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
I'm just glad we play again Tuesday.
Tired of thinking about this game. November games mean so little, but good grief was that ever hard to watch.
by The Goche on Nov 14, 2011 2:52 AM EST via mobile reply actions
That was pretty awful
I was driving in to the game listening to the coach’s interview and CKS noted that practice had been poor the day before – this is always a huge red flag. I think the guys thought that they were going to just show up and win going away and they looked surprised that Cleveland State could actually play. I agree that maybe Henderson needs to get more minutes – the guy has 8 boards in his 13 minutes of play this season – very small sample, but rebounding does appear to be a trait – guys who can rebound will generally do so regardless of how much PT you give them.
BTW, are you guys going to be doing the +/- stuff again this season – it is especially interesting this season given how many players we have off the bench and how the rotation shakes out.
After some time to cool off
I come to the same conclusions as when I walked out of Memorial. The offensive design is bad. Passing around the perimeter for 20 seconds and then shooting a three is not working. No picks for the ball handler, only the cutter to the perimeter. The defense was spotty but not terrible. We should not be held to 58 points by anyone. Also, if Jenkins has the ball on the fast break, he is not giving it up, even to a wide open wing. The main problem was lack of intensity. There were several plays where the ball was on the court and only green jerseys were on the ground diving after it. They wanted it more.
by Smoke n Mirrors on Nov 14, 2011 11:10 AM EST reply actions
What am I missing?
Acknowledging the accuracy of most of the comments above, what’s the deal with Moats and Odom?
Moats seems to have the fire that some of the other guys are missing, and he played well in the Xavier scrimmage. He’s got size. Let’s play him this year – we need to be all-in because we know what’s coming next year.
On Odom – WTF is that kid’s deal? Was he not a top 100 recruit? He is under the same trance that caught Indiana Jones in the Temple of Doom (until Shorty burned him and woke him up). Thoughts?
by branscomb breakfast on Nov 15, 2011 3:35 PM EST reply actions
I think they’re still deciding whether Moats is redshirting or not. I’ve been a pretty big fan of Odom this year. He hasn’t been scoring (that’s not his role anyway), but I think his rebounding as been very solid, which is what the team needs from him. He’s clearly put on some bulk, but he’s still too skinny to be really effective against other forwards. He’ll get there

by 




















