Non-Gambling Related Post - Dangerzone Edition
Vandy is a six point favorite overall and a three point favorite in the first half. In years past, predicting how Vandy would play in this game would be like landing on the carrier in Top Gun on the ol' 8-bit: In theory possible, somewhat confidence inducing while you're in the midst of it, but you're going to end up in the water.
Is this year's team different when it comes to responding to adversity? I think so. Safe bet is the first half line. If you're really feeling it, like Contra up up down down left right left right a b a b select start (for two player) feeling it, do the dirty on the 6 point line.
Prop bet for you consideration: which team will have more blocked shots? Hell if I know.
Prop bet not for your consideration: odds that I cry during or after the game. Last time MSU was in Mem Gym, I cried at the end of the game. Thanks, Shan. One of two times I've cried at a Vanderbilt sporting event. The other was standing in Neyland stadium at the end of VICTORY IN KNOXVILLE. I don't think it's happening tonight, no matter what happens.
As an aside, I don't give a Man Crush of the Game Award for losses, b/c when we lose it makes me sad all over, even in my heart. However, I did think there was one man crush type moment in the UK loss: Jeff Taylor's missed dunk. He missed, which was zero percent fun. However, it was a sign that the talent and ability at the house that Edwin Keeble designed has changed dramatically. It was a sign that the quality of the man crush candidates has improved dramatically. We aren't having to talk ourselves into the sort of attractive if she would wear something other than frumpy sweaters and lost the glasses theater chicks anymore. Dynamite!
6 comments
|
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd take MSU on the blocked shots
Jarvis Varnado is nasty, he’s even done that triple-double with blocks thing a few times. Hopefully CKS gave Festus the warning not to shoot around him, or else we might see a giant Nigerian cry.
TI – Granted, JV has is a filthmonster inside, but you’re assuming that we don’t get him in early foul trouble. That has to be the game plan, right?
by VandyFanwithaTie on Feb 3, 2010 10:30 AM EST up reply actions
Good point
That should have been the goal with Chism though, and he only picked up one foul all game and racked up 5 blocks. Varnado is even more beastly on D, and we have a backup center with terrible shooting mechanics just waiting for him.
by Train Island on Feb 3, 2010 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
See your point, but Chism and Cuz are much more athletic than JV. If AJ can body up on JV and keep the ball out of sight, he can draw the fouls.
by VandyFanwithaTie on Feb 3, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
Great Top Gun Reference
I played that game legitimately for five years, and never once landed on the carrier. Ever.
This is a game where we are going to have to show our balance. We need big games out of Jeff and our backcourt trio. If we do that, we can get some good points underneath, but I think this game is more important for showing our diversity of weapons than it is for leaning on our post play.
I fear what illegitimate Top Gun play might look like… I want to know when we are going to start a game the way we start every second half, i.e. feeding AJ. I think tonight may be the night. Player comments in today’s Tennessean indicate that they are upset about the UK loss. Upset. They lost to the #1 team in the country on the road and they are upset.
by VandyFanwithaTie on Feb 3, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions























