The Silver Lining: What Last Night's Loss Means for the Commodores
Last night ended about as badly as any Vanderbilt basketball game could have. In a matter of seconds, a scenario in which the 'Dores held the last shot of a tied ballgame disintegrated into a three point deficit and a desperation heave at the buzzer. The end result was a sloppy loss, but there's more to Wednesday's game than what the box score holds.
This team beat itself as much as Mizzou did (though give credit to the Tigers - they are a deep and talented team), depleting an efficient performance through turnovers and deficiency at the free throw line and on the glass. However, nothing that sunk this team Wednesday night was a problem that wasn't fixable. The issue in Columbia wasn't talent, coaching, or depth - it was mental lapses and sloppy play. What we saw on ESPN wasn't a matter of a scrappy team overachieving in a near-upset against a highly-ranked opponent, it was a sloppy, toe-to-toe slugfest where the Commodores got roped into Missouri's game and came up short in a game they should have won.
Did the team choke? A little. Did playing on the road rattle them? Yes, especially at the free throw line. Should they be upset with the outcome? Absolutely. But the team we saw last night set themselves apart from last year's team with their performance.
The positives? Festus Ezeli proved that he can score and defend against a legitimate opponent without getting into foul trouble. Jeffery Taylor asserted himself on the court and used his athleticism to create open shots and get to the rim. John Jenkins exploited holes in the Tigers' defense and the Brad Tinsley/Kyle Fuller combination almost seamlessly dealt with Mizzou's pressure defense. Lance Goulbourne and Rod Odom proved that they can fill in for one of the nation's best glue guys (Andre Walker) while he's out with mono. The problems that manifested last night were fatal flaws, but they are all correctable. For the most part, the pluses outweighed the minuses, and the national media was put on notice - this Commodore squad is for real.
The season is early and Vanderbilt is 7-2, but unlike other seasons in the Stallings era, both losses have come against legitimate opponents. Gone are the upsets by teams like Western Kentucky, Appalachian State, or Furman. In their place are a pair of defeats to likely NCAA Tournament teams by virtue of last second heroics in each. These Commodores have responded to the criticisms of the past by beefing up their nonconference schedule, playing tough teams away from Memorial Gym, and beating the teams they're supposed to.
Ask a Vandy fan whether they'd want this team's current 7-2 record or the team's 9-0 slate in 2007-2008. Back then, the team's best wins were over .500-ish teams like Georgia Tech and Wake Forest. Not one of the teams Vanderbilt beat in that season's out-of-conference schedule made it to the NCAA Tournament. Those Commodores were blasted in March by #13 seeded Siena. These Commodores? They're on their way to avoiding a similar fate.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bright side...
…I’ve been watching Mike Anderson ever since he first rolled out his “fastest 40 minutes” shtick at UAB, years ago. It’s the heir to the old Razorback “40 Minutes of Hell” press. It’s the sort of thing that you dread mortally if you are only 8 deep, as we were last night. And we hung with it and broke it as required for forty-five minutes. This speaks extremely well to our conditioning and resilience on a night when the bench was short and the pace was high, and it will serve us well later on. If we can hang with a transition game, with a shootout, with a defensive struggle – we’re going to be in good shape.
50% FT shooting makes me want to walk in front of the Caltrain, but that’s an anomaly (I hope). This was the first real road test of the year, in a top-15 team’s house, and while we didn’t exactly pass, we sure didn’t fail. I am happy to take this one as an “incomplete” and come back charging…
(DISENGAGE SUNSHINE PUMP)
(REENGAGE MAKER’S MARK PUMP)
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52
Tinsley's conditioning was impressive
He was downright spritely chugging through the press, switching hands, and getting past halfcourt last in the 2nd/overtime.
by Christian D'Andrea on Dec 9, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
Jeff played for 43 minutes!
and did so guarding Denmon, who was forced into taking 25 footers in order to get “moderate to heavily” contested looks (as opposed to completely blanketed looks).
Unfortunately, he was so gassed at the very end of OT that he failed to force his way into position for the play Stallings had called up (the Lance slip screen that worked so well earlier). Having Andre in to give Jeff “breathers” from coverage of Denmon would have been helpful. Still, we nearly pulled it off with 8.
The experience JT and LG got filling in for Andre will be huge down the line. We will reap benefits from this game. Book it.
Most balanced game, in most aspects, I've seen from the Commodores thus far.
Tinsley is playing good, and you like him on the floor, and maybe even taking those shots, at the end of the game. What happened is just unfortunate.
BT
I agree with everything ya all have said so far. The only problem I see is that Tinsley picks up his dribble at 30 feet and telegraphs his pass to the wing at least twice a game. Add that to the hopefully-never-will-happen-again list.
My favorite takeaway from the game has got to be Fezz. In a game against a top 15 opponent, Fez not only looked like he belonged but he thrived. Granted, they didn’t really have a matchup for him, but hotdamn, dude’s a beast. I know I say that after every game, but I think if he gets a little better at defensive rebounding, he could average a double double a night. Having said that, I think he really really needs to put some time on the defensive reb. department. But good things to come… Looking forward to the rest of the year.
Coaching +/-
Big plus for getting the press straightened out, especially without Andre.
Also, too many turnovers, but hard not to see some improvement considering how bad the last few games were and how many we had against Mizzou last season.
Relatively large minus for the ending in OT. Ugly. We also have yet to see CKS figure out a way to get the ball to JJ in three late game big shot situations (WVU, Mizzou regulation, Mizzou OT).
Last night was especially ugly. Brad had a nice look in regulation, but when we don’t NEED a 3, Brad taking a 3 is not an ideal choice (especially when . And in OT, Brad dribbling around and throwing up a contested prayer is awful.
Question: when we do need a 3, assuming they are roughly triple covering JJ, who is the 2nd choice? Brad? Suddenly solid 3 shooter JT? Rod “The Golden Stroke” Odom?
If he weren’t a freshman, I’d say no question it’s Odom. I guess instead it’s just whoever’s open.
We needed a two in both cases….
See: Georgetown’s Jeff Green’s TWO over Vandy
See: Murray State’s TWO over Vandy
CKS: please develop some last second two point shots. Thank you.
Amen.
Especially since you either get a great look at the bucket because they’re not trying to foul or because you get the foul and go to the line…the line might not have helped us last night, but I’m just going to hope that was an aberration.
You're forgetting the UK game
AJ with a look for 2 that rims out. He did have an alley oop opportunity to JT who probably had time to get it out of his hands and through the net.
We’re still not executing extremely well on offense. Man, we’ve got a high ceiling.
Right, my bad
Two fails needing only a 2 for the win and a fail for the tie.
I don’t think we’ve gotten a last shot once this season. I can’t think of one half where we scored with the shot-clock off or nearly off.
JJ made one
either against Grambling or Appy St.
Brad I think hit one vs. Presby.
Both of those were 1st halfers though. And against lesser quality opposition.
JJ did get one against App St.
Brad missed a lay-up against Presby.
Made one a three to end the 1st half against WVU.
Brad missed at the end of the 1st half against UNC, but that might have been a heave.
He missed a 3 in the 1st against Belmont (with a 4 second shot-clock differential, so basically last shot).
Then last night: missed at regulation, turned over in OT, missed in OT.
Andre missed a 3 in the 1st against Grambling, but also may have been a heave.
Rod O missed the 3 for the tie against WVU.
Jeff had a dunk to close-out the Nebraska game, but not a last-shot situation. He got blocked in the 1st against App. St.
So, that’s 1 taken by JJ, 1 made by JJ.
Even excluding the possible heave, that’s 4 misses and one hit by Brad.
RodO 0-1.
Jeff 0-1.
The possible heaves were Andre after a steal with just a few seconds left and Brad after a made basket with 4 seconds left. Neither times took timeouts, and neither game was close, so I won’t count those against us.
In any case, we are still 2-8 in last shot situations by my count. Ugly. Not to mention, it sure does seem like opposing teams have had some success against us late.
exactly
" it sure does seem like opposing teams have had some success against us late."
Why can’t we have a no-call travel bank shot or a running jumper.. When is it Vandy’s turn!?
In my opinion, it might almost be worth it to put in KF late and have him run as fast as he can and throw up a layup. Might get fouled or he might get so much attention that it would leave Fezz open for a monstrous game winning put back dunk. BT dribbling for 15 seconds then trying to start something out of a half court set just doesn’t do it for me.

by 



















