Five Things We Learned in Puerto Rico
This year's early-season tournament brought back mixed results but a mostly positive outcome. Vanderbilt out-slopped Nebraska, were outgunned by West Virginia, and out-muscled North Carolina on their way to a 2-1 record against three major conference schools. More importantly, the team didn't crumble against legitimate competition away from Memorial Gym, and gave fans some realistic expectations for the upcoming SEC season. While some questions still remain, last week's action presented a few truths for the college basketball faithful to ponder this holiday season.
1. John Jenkins is going to get his. Jenkins put on a display of leadership and scoring in Puerto Rico that has inspired confidence in this team's season. The sophomore averaged nearly 22 points per game in the tournament despite not really finding his range outside of the second half against West Virginia. He scored from all over the court, doing damage from long range (eight three pointers), inside the arc (eight field goals), and especially from the free throw line (25-28 total).
Jenkins still isn't much for setting up others and his dribbling needs to improve, but the highly touted guard showed that there's more to his game than just three-pointers. Many, including myself, questioned how he would react when teams pressured him at the arc and forced him inside. So far, he's been able to handle the pressure. Though he hasn't been as efficient as he could be, John Jenkins showed that he plans on being the top scoring option for this team in 2011.
2. Jeffery Taylor is going to struggle with consistency. The junior didn't exactly have a tournament to remember, playing poorly against Nebraska and West Virginia, but it wasn't a total loss. Taylor's start to the UNC game was some of the best basketball I've ever seen from a single player. Only Shan Foster's performance against Mississippi State tops it as far as explosive acts of ridiculousness go. In under three minutes, the much-hyped junior drained two threes, made an And-1 layup, and had two insane blocks on what should have been easy North Carolina baskets.
And then, he disappeared.
Taylor was a non-factor offensively for the rest of the half, and though his defense on Harrison Barnes was still impressive, it was tough not to wonder about what happened to the Swedish Eagle as the game wore on. He reemerged in the second half to pick up some easy points, but wasn't the force that he suggested he could be with his flurry of scoring early in the game. Is it a confidence issue? Was Taylor just focusing more on defense? Was it a conscious strategy to defer to others? Maybe it's not that important - Vanderbilt opened up a double-digit lead and played encouragingly while Taylor was his quietest on offense.
3. Brad Tinsley has three months to work on his ballhandling. Kyle Fuller, in the meantime, should get used to taking over against the full court press. Tinsley has been solid at the point so far, making his teammates better with understated play and providing a little bit of everything as floor general. That said, he struggled mightily against North Carolina's full court pressure, and clearly lacks confidence in his ballhandling ability. When pressed, Tinsley struggled with outrunning his defender or finding open teammates coming to help. This failure led to Vandy's 22 turnovers against the Tar Heels.
Fuller, however, showed a greater level of composure when trusted with the ball. Though he's not the passer, scorer, or playmaker that Tinsley is right now, he has the quickness and dribbling ability to keep his head up against the full court press and get the ball into the half court. If he can adjust his offense enough to be effective (I can't count his circus-shot scoring as an asset just yet), he will be a major asset to the team as a freshman. He's already made the case for a Fuller-Tinsley backcourt in extended stretches when John Jenkins is on the bench.
4. Festus Ezeli is going to keep opposing defenses honest - and give opposing coaches nightmares - if he can stay on the court. Ezeli left Puerto Rico on a high note, scoring 15 points with nine rebounds against UNC, but he also left San Juan with 13 fouls in just 58 total minutes for the tournament. Fes proved that he can finish around the rim and that opposing bigs will have to stay with him rather than jump out on double teams - which means that guys like Taylor and Jenkins should get easier looks throughout the season. However, this doesn't have much of an impact if the big Nigerian can't stay on the floor for more than 20 minutes per game.
Part of the problem could be attributed to the Tip-Off's overzealous refs, but the balance between Ezeli's development on the court and the foul trouble keeping him on the bench will be a recurring theme for the Commodores. The more Festus plays, the better this team does. Just as importantly, more court time will help aid his continuing growth - and hopefully affect his gentle touch around the rim on offense.
5. The bench is as good as we thought it could be. Lance Goulbourne, Steve Tchiengang, Rod Odom, and Kyle Fuller have rounded out the team's nine-man rotation, and each player has had their own impressive spurts early in the season. Odom showcased a soft scoring touch against West Virginia. Tchiengang proved that he can handle the duties at center and pull down rebounds in traffic. Goulbourne had a breakout game against UNC and seems to be growing into the potential he showed as a freshman. Even Fuller, who has had some hiccups so far this year, has looked capable of handling the point early in his career.
There will be growing pains, especially with two freshmen getting significant minutes, but it's hard not to like what Vandy has stacked on their bench. As the season develops and these players' roles become more clearly defined, the Commodores will only get stronger. There's still a lot of work to be done, but the actual results so far bode well for the potential results of the future.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
JJ23 = SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS
Seriously, I can’t remember the last time we went nine deep and every combination on the floor was deadly. We can play fast, we can play strong, we can butt heads and we can machine-gun…all we need is time to keep getting better…
I now fully disregard the oblate spheroid. Let’s saddle up and ride.
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52
All good points
Perhaps the biggest thing we learned was that this team will play defense consistently, and has the ability to be a very good rebounding team. This was perhaps the biggest question going into the season, and the largest obstacle preventing us from being able to maintain or improve on last season’s successes. For the concerns about replacing AJ’s offense, it is his defense that we have really improved upon this season. Even though Steve probably won’t have AJ’s block rate, both he and Ezeli are superior defensive players and are also much more consistent in their effort levels. This was not a given going into the season as Ezeli has been known to be out of position at times in previous seasons due to a lack of knowledge.
It is intersting that two of the things we learned (#2 and #3) are now the two largest remaining questions IMO. Brad has to do a better job setting up the offense – we should have beaten UNC by 15+ had we not turned over the ball 9 times in the first 10 mins of the second half (4 by Brad), and this will bite us at some point (MIzzou) if it isn’t fixed soon. And when Taylor is on, we can be not only a good team, but a dominant one. His shot has clearly improved – he just need to take over games and be a little bit more selfish.
We haven’t come anywhere close to playing a complete game, and have been pretty mediocre overall on offense, but you have the sense that this will come in time. But having a lot of questions resolved in a positive manner is a very good sign.
The offense looked pretty mediocre when UNC really played defense, and it wasn’t just breaking the press. When they played good half-court D, we didn’t do much.
This is particularly true when the defense is particulalry strong in the back court.
We need to work hard on getting the HC offense started against good defensive guards as in West Virginia. That means Fuller getting in more against more athletic backcourts, and I think we’ll continue to use Walker in the point-forward role some. But in general, it really has to be something CKS can coach around because teams will be going after Brad if they have the athletes.
But even beyond the PG pressure we haven’t really shown a lot of ability to break down a team this is really working on defense, especially man defense. I think that’s where Jeff really has to be willing and able to carry the load.
by The Goche on Nov 23, 2010 5:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Just to be clear, I’m referring to regular back court D, not the full court, like when we had the halfcourt set up, but Brad was getting totally shutdown 30-35 feet from the basket.
by The Goche on Nov 23, 2010 6:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Another thing to remember
is that Stallings focused almost all of the preseason on defense. He only really began installing the offense a few days before Presby. There’s no way the team has had enough reps and time to be able to really execute it properly. It will come. Hopefully before Mizzou.
I agree with Coach
We didn’t see this team play close to its best (with the possible exception of the first 5 minutes against UNC). They hung around, played defense and made enough shots to be competitive and/or win. There was not a run where you felt Vandy was dominating but you looked up and they were cutting into the lead against WVU or extending it against UNC. Once JJ gets it going from three, this will be a very dangerous team.
by Smoke n Mirrors on Nov 23, 2010 11:25 PM EST reply actions

by 




















