A Modest Proposal Regarding Student Attendance
As you can see, typical student support at Vanderbilt games lately hasn't exactly been spectacular. Students at Vanderbilt haven't always been so consistent in their lack of support. Certainly there's an argument to be made that winning begets fan support, and clearly the football team struggled this season in that department. But as winning leads to more fans, so too do more fans lead to more winning, leaving us with a nasty catch-22.
What to do about it? I'm glad you asked.
My modest proposal will be based on basketball, but it could easily be adapted for football or baseball. Let me begin by saying that fan support for basketball is far from poor. In fact, the students do a relatively good job (compared to football) showing up to all the games. In fact, the "Belle Meade Section" (A-F) of Memorial is often more sparsely populated than the student section. That said, student attendance is still a far cry from what it used to be prior to the JVBK coaching years, when the student section (and the rest of the gym, overall) was a sellout for every game of the season.
These days during the pre-conference portion of the schedule, the student section fluctuates from half full to three-quarters full, depending on opponent. The schedule is particularly strong this season (and the team is particularly good) and the student section was about 75% full for the lone home game thus far versus Lipscomb. I will be interested to see how full the student section is for the Missouri game tomorrow night.
So what can be done to ensure even more attendance? My proposal is pretty simple. Since the school has the capability of using student ids to measure student attendance, why not tie the attendance to the non-conference games to admission to the SEC opponents later in the season?
For example, TSU currently is the lowest ranked (260, Pomeroy) opponent scheduled to play at Memorial this season. What if the school tied the attendance to the TSU game with the Kentucky or Tennessee home game later in the season? Since there are guaranteed to be more students wishing to attend the UK or UT game than there will be student tickets available, why not reward the students who attended the TSU game with UK or UT ticket priority over those who chose not to attend? Next find the next-least-appealing non-conference opponent, and match the attendance to that game with priority for the next-most-appealing home conference game. And so on, and so forth. Of course, concessions must be made for thanksgiving and "winter" break.
Finally, implementing this system wouldn't necessarily be that difficult, thanks to technology that's already in place at the university.
In my eyes, this system would go a long way to encouraging consistently high student fan support. Considering that the students are among the most vocal fans at any Vanderbilt sporting event (particularly basketball), and considering that the school cannot really do any more to encourage fans in the "Belle Meade Section" to attend (other than perhaps to increase local advertising), adding vocal fans can help create a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Thoughts? I'd love to hear some other ideas in the comments...
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Comments
Student Attendance
As Vanderbilt’s acceptance rates have gone down, so has student attendance to sporting events. No longer is there a large representation of students from the area who have grown up watching these games. These students from the Nashville area are now rejected so that the school can become more geographically diverse. These students would be supporting the Dores and bringing their classmates to the games. Their parents, many who are alumni, are mad that their students are no longer being accepted to Vanderbilt and are no longer attending either. Because alumni are from distant locations and do not travel fare to return to games, especially for losing teams, local support is needed to fill the stadium. This will continue to get worse in the name of geographical diversity – most of these kids have not been life long fans, so will not venture over from the Commons to cheer on a losing team. Our stadium will continue to lose a home field advantage. Even basketball was not full last year since the Commons opened and the trek for freshman is further.
by iluvvandy on Dec 1, 2009 11:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
Students should be rewarded for devotion. That would drive me crazy not being able to go to a UK game just because non-fans just wanted to be a part of things.
One problem with our fan base is that a lot of 3rd level seats are held by ticket scalpers. You can check StubHub at any given time and see large blocks of tickets there. Not pairs, but like blocks of 10-12. Just seems wrong somehow.
by doreposts on Dec 2, 2009 12:08 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
About those Scalpers...
You can be sure that those tickets on StubHub will be snatched up by UT and UK fans before you’ll ever see anyone in black and gold in the stands for the respective games. Kentucky fans are rabid enough to buy season tickets at other schools just to get in that school’s ticket allotment for the SEC tournament so I’m sure they won’t mind paying a premium for one game.
I saw this at Ole Miss this season with football. As soon as we were ranked in the top 25 our season tickets sold out. At first I was really pleased thinking that our fans were pumped about the potentially good season. Then I looked online and saw all of the tickets for games like Alabama and LSU being sold in blocks of 4-6 for something close to $2,000. The worst part was that there were legitimate Ole Miss fans who had submitted single-game ticket requests for those same games. Their credit cards had been charged and everything and then when the scalpers came in and bought up all of the season tickets, there weren’t any “available” seats for them so they got a letter in the mail saying sorry, no tickets for you. Sure, they got their money back for the tickets but they lost deposits on hotel rooms and flights that had been booked in advance.
by Catfish Row on Dec 2, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















